<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sliced Bread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tsearl.edublogs.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>Reflections on Learning 70:20:10</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:04:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Well, just exactly do we want? by Mr S</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/2009/11/18/well-just-exactly-do-we-want/comment-page-1/#comment-271</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsearl.edublogs.org/?p=330#comment-271</guid>
		<description>We bang on about &quot;same old same old&quot; and get deafened by the echo. Never mind I guess.
Year 9 now have their &quot;boxes of connected learning&quot; and yet few authentically new ideas about HOW we need to change learning have emerged, yet.

I&#039;m happy the landscape is messy. 

I have heard more staff ask recent questions of ICT. 
Fear factor or embracing? I guess it really matters little, yay to the new movement!
At least if teachers have concerns we&#039;ll seek solutions.

Thanks for the w00t link Mr L
Have a great Christmas Tomaz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We bang on about &#8220;same old same old&#8221; and get deafened by the echo. Never mind I guess.<br />
Year 9 now have their &#8220;boxes of connected learning&#8221; and yet few authentically new ideas about HOW we need to change learning have emerged, yet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy the landscape is messy. </p>
<p>I have heard more staff ask recent questions of ICT.<br />
Fear factor or embracing? I guess it really matters little, yay to the new movement!<br />
At least if teachers have concerns we&#8217;ll seek solutions.</p>
<p>Thanks for the w00t link Mr L<br />
Have a great Christmas Tomaz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Well, just exactly do we want? by Tomaz Lasic</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/2009/11/18/well-just-exactly-do-we-want/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomaz Lasic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsearl.edublogs.org/?p=330#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Hooray for Mr Searl ! A beauty that resonates across the Nullarbor (and further I dare say).

Mate, I&#039;m only going to offer you a link:
http://patapata.sourceforge.net/WhyEducationalTechnologyHasFailedSchools.html

Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooray for Mr Searl ! A beauty that resonates across the Nullarbor (and further I dare say).</p>
<p>Mate, I&#8217;m only going to offer you a link:<br />
<a href="http://patapata.sourceforge.net/WhyEducationalTechnologyHasFailedSchools.html" rel="nofollow">http://patapata.sourceforge.net/WhyEducationalTechnologyHasFailedSchools.html</a></p>
<p>Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Well, just exactly do we want? by Mr S</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/2009/11/18/well-just-exactly-do-we-want/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsearl.edublogs.org/?p=330#comment-269</guid>
		<description>Troy
Your point &quot;we just try to do our job&quot; resonates. 

If the premise of quality student learning is our core then we should expect professionals to use whatever it takes to deliver that. 

Whilst high stakes summative tests remain at government behests, the excuse to avoid learning for now also remains. 

Governments must now provide brave leadership in assessment reform. 

Whilst schools pretend to offer panaceas for the ever increasing societal ills, we also get distracted from our core.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troy<br />
Your point &#8220;we just try to do our job&#8221; resonates. </p>
<p>If the premise of quality student learning is our core then we should expect professionals to use whatever it takes to deliver that. </p>
<p>Whilst high stakes summative tests remain at government behests, the excuse to avoid learning for now also remains. </p>
<p>Governments must now provide brave leadership in assessment reform. </p>
<p>Whilst schools pretend to offer panaceas for the ever increasing societal ills, we also get distracted from our core.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Well, just exactly do we want? by Mr S</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/2009/11/18/well-just-exactly-do-we-want/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 22:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsearl.edublogs.org/?p=330#comment-268</guid>
		<description>Ben
Questioning future directions and seeking improvement through change is my learning focus. If that happens to also involve, ICt great. What we currently call school education is suffering a distinct lack of leader vision for fundamental change. 

Parents and students will ultimately drive change as they question why quality is distributed unevenly. 
&quot;Why is that student/system/school able to access that open learning when my child can&#039;t?&quot; Result? Alternative delivery models, much like we have had for centuries in home school models, except this time digitally enriched for personal learning.

Schools, systems and politicians have a vested interest NOT to cede centralised hub control. Future learning &#039;ownership&#039; will be far more in the hands of individuals and not organisations and certainly not with gatekeepers, who currently politicise ICT that will soon be cost negligible.

Unfortunately this also means generational change, often in developed economies, first. Concurrently those world economies who have little to &#039;unlearn&#039; from their past education models, may leap frog past as cost for them also becomes negligible and open access is the norm.

Economic imperitives have driven government&#039;s latest ICT largesse, NOT education or learning. If learning was the focus then that would be the debate, not the technology.

I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll learn heaps at your first teaching appointment in the Territory. Great to have you comment on ye olde chalkies rants. Cheers Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben<br />
Questioning future directions and seeking improvement through change is my learning focus. If that happens to also involve, ICt great. What we currently call school education is suffering a distinct lack of leader vision for fundamental change. </p>
<p>Parents and students will ultimately drive change as they question why quality is distributed unevenly.<br />
&#8220;Why is that student/system/school able to access that open learning when my child can&#8217;t?&#8221; Result? Alternative delivery models, much like we have had for centuries in home school models, except this time digitally enriched for personal learning.</p>
<p>Schools, systems and politicians have a vested interest NOT to cede centralised hub control. Future learning &#8216;ownership&#8217; will be far more in the hands of individuals and not organisations and certainly not with gatekeepers, who currently politicise ICT that will soon be cost negligible.</p>
<p>Unfortunately this also means generational change, often in developed economies, first. Concurrently those world economies who have little to &#8216;unlearn&#8217; from their past education models, may leap frog past as cost for them also becomes negligible and open access is the norm.</p>
<p>Economic imperitives have driven government&#8217;s latest ICT largesse, NOT education or learning. If learning was the focus then that would be the debate, not the technology.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll learn heaps at your first teaching appointment in the Territory. Great to have you comment on ye olde chalkies rants. Cheers Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Well, just exactly do we want? by Troy</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/2009/11/18/well-just-exactly-do-we-want/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsearl.edublogs.org/?p=330#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Wow, exactly what I have been pondering, unable to put into words.
Since the slow rolling thunder of the DER devices, I&#039;ve discovered that the ICT cross curriculum content of the Stage Four and Five syllabi had not been embraced in my subject area, at my school. That throws a new light on what we need to do: start preparing teachers and learners from year 7 and 8 for the possibility of a connected learning environment, one that takes a step back from the $22 000 budget for photocopying. Or shall we just throw the ICT stuff onto year 9 and, from 2010, year 10? 
Also I&#039;ve discovered that traditional teaching in my subject area is valued by my colleagues. If you want to embrace the two forms, that is student centred, ICT, learning for understanding or teacher centred knowledge for testing, your students may suffer in state wide NAPLAN or SC results.
I am a geek. A bit of a book nerd and since I started teaching 7 short years ago, a bit of a techno geek. You know the kind. Using email for students to attach assignments and to provide immediate feedback, using track changes to show students editing techniques, demanding of time in the computer lab, the teacher who books out the lab at the start of a term and doesn’t apologise, I even use basic stuff like MS Movie Maker or MS Front Page. Like hundreds of other teachers, I guess, I saw technology as another way to engage in learning. I am not an early adpoter, I just try to do my job.
I want a culture of student centred learning, of exploration and interaction, where knowledge and understanding is valued, learning not testing matters, a 21st century classroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, exactly what I have been pondering, unable to put into words.<br />
Since the slow rolling thunder of the DER devices, I&#8217;ve discovered that the ICT cross curriculum content of the Stage Four and Five syllabi had not been embraced in my subject area, at my school. That throws a new light on what we need to do: start preparing teachers and learners from year 7 and 8 for the possibility of a connected learning environment, one that takes a step back from the $22 000 budget for photocopying. Or shall we just throw the ICT stuff onto year 9 and, from 2010, year 10?<br />
Also I&#8217;ve discovered that traditional teaching in my subject area is valued by my colleagues. If you want to embrace the two forms, that is student centred, ICT, learning for understanding or teacher centred knowledge for testing, your students may suffer in state wide NAPLAN or SC results.<br />
I am a geek. A bit of a book nerd and since I started teaching 7 short years ago, a bit of a techno geek. You know the kind. Using email for students to attach assignments and to provide immediate feedback, using track changes to show students editing techniques, demanding of time in the computer lab, the teacher who books out the lab at the start of a term and doesn’t apologise, I even use basic stuff like MS Movie Maker or MS Front Page. Like hundreds of other teachers, I guess, I saw technology as another way to engage in learning. I am not an early adpoter, I just try to do my job.<br />
I want a culture of student centred learning, of exploration and interaction, where knowledge and understanding is valued, learning not testing matters, a 21st century classroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Well, just exactly do we want? by BArcher</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/2009/11/18/well-just-exactly-do-we-want/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>BArcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 05:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsearl.edublogs.org/?p=330#comment-265</guid>
		<description>Searlie, you know I&#039;ve always had mad love for your work, both as a student and now as a fellow teacher.

You&#039;ve hit the noodle on the noggin&#039; yet again, and this is the reason why ICT in schools is going to struggle to get off the ground. There is no question that needs answering or anything necessarily WRONG with education here in Australia.

What do I want? I want to give my students the best resources possible and to help them to get the best results they can. Whether ICT is the answer or not, is irrelevant. But seeing as the government is going to give it to us, we may as well use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searlie, you know I&#8217;ve always had mad love for your work, both as a student and now as a fellow teacher.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve hit the noodle on the noggin&#8217; yet again, and this is the reason why ICT in schools is going to struggle to get off the ground. There is no question that needs answering or anything necessarily WRONG with education here in Australia.</p>
<p>What do I want? I want to give my students the best resources possible and to help them to get the best results they can. Whether ICT is the answer or not, is irrelevant. But seeing as the government is going to give it to us, we may as well use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Mr S</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/about/comment-page-1/#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Always pleased to share ideas and resources with our Kiwi cousins, hey bro? 

Many eduTools are over-rated and misused for improved learning,(but still fun to play with). Find a core selection of quality opensource (like voicethread, edmodo, flickr, gdocs) and become proficient in applying them for learning. 

cheers &amp; thanks for dropping by Tania.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always pleased to share ideas and resources with our Kiwi cousins, hey bro? </p>
<p>Many eduTools are over-rated and misused for improved learning,(but still fun to play with). Find a core selection of quality opensource (like voicethread, edmodo, flickr, gdocs) and become proficient in applying them for learning. </p>
<p>cheers &#038; thanks for dropping by Tania.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Tania OMeagher</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/about/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Tania OMeagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tony for getting &quot;in touch&quot; via twitter. Have popped in here to see who you are and what you&#039;re about. And like where you&#039;re coming from. Will definitely pop in regularly because am sure I&#039;ll be able to get valuable info for my field. I&#039;m ICT support at Nelson Central Primary School in New Zealand. Love the emerging tools, but like what you say about not rushing in under the hype etc .....even tho it&#039;s all exciting. ULearn &#039;09 in Chch was great. Ka Kite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tony for getting &#8220;in touch&#8221; via twitter. Have popped in here to see who you are and what you&#8217;re about. And like where you&#8217;re coming from. Will definitely pop in regularly because am sure I&#8217;ll be able to get valuable info for my field. I&#8217;m ICT support at Nelson Central Primary School in New Zealand. Love the emerging tools, but like what you say about not rushing in under the hype etc &#8230;..even tho it&#8217;s all exciting. ULearn &#8216;09 in Chch was great. Ka Kite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Need My Teachers To Learn by Tweets that mention I Need My Teachers To Learn &#124; Sliced Bread -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/2009/09/13/i-need-my-teachers-to-learn/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention I Need My Teachers To Learn &#124; Sliced Bread -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsearl.edublogs.org/?p=312#comment-254</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TonySearl. TonySearl said: My education daily double &quot;I need my teacher to learn&quot; followed by &quot;elearning sucks&quot; PD at our place this week http://tinyurl.com/n6gonr [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by TonySearl. TonySearl said: My education daily double &quot;I need my teacher to learn&quot; followed by &quot;elearning sucks&quot; PD at our place this week <a href="http://tinyurl.com/n6gonr" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/n6gonr</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital Education Revolution NSW (&#8221;It&#8217;s almost here &#8230;. it&#8217;s almost here&#8221;) by A Teacher&#8217;s Guide to Web2.0 at School &#124; Sliced Bread</title>
		<link>http://tsearl.edublogs.org/2009/08/22/digital-education-revolution-nsw-its-almost-here-its-almost-here/comment-page-1/#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>A Teacher&#8217;s Guide to Web2.0 at School &#124; Sliced Bread</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tsearl.edublogs.org/?p=263#comment-253</guid>
		<description>[...] massive apologies to Banjo Patterson ( love your work AB) DER&#8217;s frisky colt, Hi Ho Netbook, is currently bolting through 800 plus statewide year9 paddocks, as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] massive apologies to Banjo Patterson ( love your work AB) DER&#8217;s frisky colt, Hi Ho Netbook, is currently bolting through 800 plus statewide year9 paddocks, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>